Skip to main content

You must be a logged-in member of UHMS or a subscriber to the UHMS Journal in order to download the articles listed within these pages. If you are a member or subscriber, please log in using the Log In button above. If you would like to purchase a membership or a subscription, use the buttons below.

Search UHM/UBR

A study of decompression sickness using recorded depth-time profiles

Introduction: 122,129 dives by 10,358 recreational divers were recorded by dive computers from 11 manufacturers in an exploratory study of how dive profile, breathing gas (air or nitrox [N2/O2] mixes), repetitive diving, gender, age, and dive site conditions influenced observed decompression sickness (DCSobs). Thirty-eight reports were judged as DCS. Overall DCSobs was 3.1 cases/104 dives. 

Methods: Three dive groups were studied: Basic (live-aboard and shore/dayboat), Cozumel Dive Guides, and Scapa Flow wreck divers. A probabilistic decompression model, BVM(3), controlled dive profile variability. Chi-squared test, t-test, logistic regression, and log-rank tests evaluated statistical associations.

Results: (a) DCSobs was 0.7/104 (Basic), 7.6/104 (Guides), and 17.3/104 (Scapa) and differed after control for dive variability (p<0.001). (b) DCSobs was greater for 22%-29% nitrox (12.6/104) than for 30%-50% nitrox (2.04/104) (p ≤ 0.0064) which did not differ from air (2.97/104). (c) For daily repetitive dives (<12-hour surface intervals (SI)), DCS occurred only following one or two dives (4.3/104 DCSobs; p<0.001) where SIs were shorter than after three or more dives. (d) For multiday repetitive dives (SIs < 48 hours), DCS was associated with high multiday repetitive dive counts only for Guides (p = 0.0018). (e) DCSobs decreased with age at 3%/year (p ≤ 0.0144). (f) Males dived deeper (p<0.001) but for less time than females (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Collecting dive profiles with dive computers and controlling for profile variability by probabilistic modeling was feasible, but analytical results require independent confirmation due to limited observed DCS. Future studies appear promising if more DCS cases are gathered, stakeholders cooperate, and identified data collection problems are corrected.

DOI: 10.22462/01.03.2020.9